Have You Heard

Thoughts On The Bikini Bridge Gap And What It Says About Young Men

bridge

It’s my intention for the blog to be generally work-safe, which means that I can’t actually show you a picture of the “bikini bridge gap”. Instead, I’ve chosen to excerpt an article from another site that neatly explains the idea. You can Google “bikini bridge gap” if you like, and you’ll find all sorts of images, including many of the motivational/hoax “macros” created in service of the concept.

When you’re done, come back and we’ll talk about it.

Hello again! Fascinating, isn’t it? But why does it exist? Why did someone come up with the idea of the “bikini bridge gap” and why did thousands of (mostly) young men immediately run out to try to make it a thing?

Full disclosure: your humble author has been a lurker on 4chan for a very long time now. Not as long as the site’s been around, but about as long as it’s been possible for well-informed outsiders to realize that many of the “memes” seen in popular culture are originally baked there. Ironically, 4chan isn’t what it used to be in that regard; the watered-down clone sites like 9GAG are probably contributing a lot more to the ebb and flow of memetic sewage nowadays. There’s a kind of weird feedback between 9GAG and Reddit as well that’s bubbling up a self-sustaining culture. Signs — danger signs! — that someone you love could be involved in that culture include: the use of “le” before everything, the replacement of the banal “lol” with the contemptible “lel” and “kek”, use of “trollface” graphics, that sort of thing.

The bikini bridge thing, however, could only have come from 4chan. It’s brilliant in its own way and it has a purpose that would only really make sense to a long-term member of that site and/or someone who completely shares the mentality of long-term 4channers. I’ll explain the purpose and the mentality in a moment. But first, a brief note on the idea of so-called “beta males” and “omega males” in the context of modern male-female relationships.

I’m deeply ambivalent about the so-called “manosphere” and/or the “PUA” (pickup artist) community. Mostly because I sincerely, deeply do not want a single thing that any of these men say or write to be true. I want to believe in love and romance and the triumph of the spirit and all of the things you read on the more expensive Hallmark cards. I regard the idea of “asshole game” and “jerkboy charisma” and “pump-and-dump” the same way I regard the idea that there are tiny centipede monsters living on my eyelashes. It might be true, it might work in practice, but I don’t want to think about it at all.

The manosphere writers refer to the “Red Pill”, which is itself a reference to the scene in The Matrix where Neo is offered a choice between two pills. Taking the Red Pill will reveal reality to him. Taking the Blue Pill will return him to the embrace of the Matrix and allow him to forget everything he’s been shown. It’s common for PUAs to talk about their “red pill moment” — the exact instance when they realized that everything popular culture had told them about women was wrong and that everything the manosphere said was right.

I’ll share my “Red Pill Moment” with all of you. Because I’m unusually stubborn and slow to accept reality, it was really a pair of moments. First: A woman I’d known a long time, about the same age as me, asked me to dinner. She told me how she was sick of her “boring” husband who wouldn’t take her to the local strip-mall bar every night. This woman lived in a $750,000 house, drove a new Lexus truck, and worked part-time for her own amusement. Her husband was a hard-working, successful man who had beaten alcoholism a few years ago and as a consequence needed to avoid strip-mall bars. He didn’t prevent her from going; he just wouldn’t go himself.

I strongly advised her to make things work with her husband, and then I went home and thought for a long time about what a broken person she was. That was the first moment. The second moment happened a couple of years later when the same woman called me up and suggested that we go out for drinks. At this point she was divorced. Her ex-husband had done everything possible to make her comfortable: expensive new condo, new Lexus truck, maintenance payments. I rode my motorcycle over to her place, at which point it became apparent that “drinks” were going to happen at her place, and that “drinks” really meant “sex.”

I’m always the kind of person who is willing to look a gift horse directly in the teeth so I had to ask her: why would she possibly be interested in sleeping with me instead of sleeping with someone who loved her so much he was willing to maintain her in luxury even after an acrimonious divorce? I should point out at this point that the ex-husband was better-looking than I was by any reasonable standard, in better shape, and far wealthier. The motorcycle I was riding at the time had cost me, as I recall, eighteen hundred dollars.

“You’re just not boring like he is,” she said, and removed her top to display a rack that wouldn’t have shamed a woman fifteen years younger. Let’s assume, for the sake of discussion, that I had the moral courage to immediately depart the premises.

The whole ride home, I was profoundly disturbed. This was exactly the kind of crap that the Red Pill guys were writing about. Women chasing excitement and novelty at all costs, abandoning or spurning good solid men in favor of cheap-motorcycle-riding philandering part-time autowriters. In the years that followed, I saw the same things time and time again: women chasing novelty and “alpha/jerkboy” behavior the same way men chase beauty and sex appeal.

I have a never-ending supply of so-called Blue Pills and I take them all the time. Whenever I meet someone I find attractive. Whenever I think about my son and his future that I hope will include a perfect girl for him. Whenever I hear about a friend or acquaintance of mine being thrown over in favor of the proverbial “outlaw biker”, or whenever I see my “outlaw biker” friends make a new pump-and-dump conquest. Please let the old ideas of romance and love be true, I whisper, and I swallow the pill, and I wake up the next day willing to be convinced of anything. Alas, it usually doesn’t stick.

But let’s get back to the bikini bridge thing. One of the core beliefs of the manosphere is the idea that the sexual revolution and women’s liberation fundamentally changed the way women select men. The story goes like this: In the good old days, when sexual behavior was well-regulated by society and “morals” were front and center, most women eventually settled down with a man who was “good enough” for them to have as a long-term partner. They might have continued to dream about Clark Gable or John Wayne at night, the same way their less-than-perfect husbands continued to read Playboy, but in general about eighty percent of humanity found satisfying arrangements and the species continued.

When women found themselves with no limits on their sexuality or behavior, they set their sights higher. Not “higher” in the sense of “more decent and respectable”, but “higher” in the sense of “more exciting and sexy and outlaw and alpha and whatnot”. All of a sudden, as the infamous DeliciousTacos says, five guys in the whole world are fucking everyone. More realistically, the “hottest” guys are having low-commitment sex with more women while the “regular” guys are becoming what 4chan calls “incels”.

That’s INvoluntarily CELibate.

Imagine a college class of a thousand people: five hundred men and five hundred women. One hundred of those guys are sleeping with three hundred of those women. The other two hundred are “distributed” among four hundred men. These are completely non-scientific numbers, of course. But it matches what I’ve seen in the dating marketplace and heard from younger male friends. Any way you slice it, you wind up with a significant number of incels.

To be an incel, a member of the unlaid, is a very frustrating thing. Believe me, I know; I was two or three years younger than everyone else in my high school class. I didn’t have a hope in hell of dating seriously until I got into a situation where I was surrounded by people my own age. My high school girlfriend, God bless her heart, went to another school and was a few grades below me. We rarely saw each other. I was, basically, an incel.

However, I knew the situation was temporary. I knew I was tall and although I was ugly I’d seen ugly guys hook up. The important thing was to be tall and to brood mysteriously. These things I could do. Plus, I had a guitar. Things worked out okay for me.

The incels of today have no such confidence. In their teens, they look ahead to college and see a hookup culture that favors the handsome and daring. In college, they look ahead to twentysomething life and they imagine an endless procession of lonely nights in bars watching a guy with a faux-hawk and a tribal tattoo arranging a threesome near the jukebox. As twentysomethings, they console themselves that they might eventually pick up a veteran of the hookup culture who will accept them for their job and their house and dutifully lie on the bed and take it while dreaming of the hockey player from Beta Theta Pi who date-raped them one drunken night fifteen years ago.

They have phrases: “cock carousel”, “hitting the Wall”, “alpha fucks/beta bucks”. They eventually come to see women as fundamentally different, fundamentally contemptible beings. Eventually, they come to hate women. Not in the turning-gay sense, but in the incel sense. Women are the enemy. Women are unreliable, evil, always willing to hurt and humiliate you even as they debase themselves in front of the Affliction-wearing bartender.

A disproportionate number of incels are extremely intelligent, because a majority of women tend to be suspicious of intelligence in men and associate it with creepiness/nerdiness/unfuckability. So what do you get when you have a vast community of permanent incels with high IQs and plenty of time on their hands?

You get the Bikini Bridge Gap. The purpose of the BBG is to make women unhappy. Not a particular woman. It’s targeted at anyone who sees it. It’s designed to make women feel sad and sick and ashamed about their bodies, to make them starve and humiliate themselves, to make them compete harder with other women and feel more depressed as a result. Its a memetic weapon leveled directly against the entire 12-to-40 female demographic.

The BBG cannot get incels laid. To the contrary; after starving themselves and hating themselves, the young women in question will be even more firmly targeted on the top quartile of available men. But it has the potential to make some woman out there just as unhappy as the incel who made the “image macro” in the first place.

If the idea of an attack or disease targeted specifically at women sounds vaguely familiar, then it’s probably because you’ve read The White Plague by Frank Herbert of Dune fame. Of course, the White Plague was meant to punish mankind, not womankind. But the core idea — a disease sent out to infect all women regardless of personality, race, whatever — remains.

The Bikini Bridge Gap was “unmasked” pretty early on, but that doesn’t mean that it didn’t take hold in the minds of many young women who will, in the long run, be unhappier for it. Hell, one CrossFit mouthpiece immediately jumped on the bandwagon and started offering BBG-specific Crossfit classes. There’s always a useful idiot like that sitting around.

A society with a high number of incels cannot be healthy. It’s already led to the so-called MGTOW, a movement of men simply forsaking the company of women in favor of video-gaming or watching sports or other hobbies. To some degree, that’s the same as dropping out of society, which is bad. And it’s sad, because there’s nothing more satisfying or wonderful than a decent relationship with a woman whom you love. That’s a feeling that these poor kids on 4chan and elsewhere may never know. At most, they’ll have the satisfaction of conquest, followed by unease and self-doubt. They deserve better. We all do. I don’t know what the solution could possibly be — a public service campaign designed to get women to date non-outlaw-bikers? — but something needs to be done. This “hoax” campaign is only the beginning of the backlash, but it would be nice were it to be the end, as well.


Categorised as: What I think


18 Comments

  1. Power6 says:

    Very interesting, I hadn’t linked thigh gap and bikini bridge to misogyny before.

    And I do think the PUA scene breeds misogyny. Too bad because if you take it casually, look into it, see what you can learn, it can be a movement of confidence and social skills. That’s what Neil Strauss and some of the others tried to bring to it, at least before he broke up with that guitar chick. There will always be “enthusiasts” who take something to its logical conclusion, i.e. too far. But those people have given up other parts of their life to dedicate such time to this. They are not the same as a “natural”.

    I’m happily married now so don’t think about this stuff much any more, except that I am thankful I learned to be happy with myself and accept my own social value, it continues to help me in other parts of life.

  2. Tre Deuce says:

    Jeezus! COL! You never know what your in for when accessing ‘Have You Heard’.

    Not going to get into the social issues/quandaries posed by the post, but the images from Google remind me of walking the beaches of Ipanema and Copacabana, and the beaches along Ocean Blvd in Ft. Lauderdale.

    Ok! Well, when someone asked my wife, who could have any man she wanted, why she picked me? My wife said… ‘Because she knew life would never be boring’. Poor grrl, she got more then she bargained for.

    Women secretly want the guy they know they can’t control, i.e. … Keep. But they settle for a time with the guy who is controllable, and a good provider. Then that guy becomes to familiar… boring. Not all women are so afflicted, or I hope that some aren’t, but then I’m a afflicted by terminal optimism and am an unrepentant dreamer.

    Note; I should note that men are not really that different, fundamentally, the difference is structural. Only the definition of excitement, is different between the sexes.

    When a woman does manage to grab most of the attention of an aloof or exciting guy, they eventually resent his independence and less then constant attention and lack of ego stroking. They always need to be told how beautiful they are. Even smart grrl’s need that, but they are a hell of lot more fun and even a little dangerous, themselves.

    It, is, all, really pretty simple in human terms, and nothing is going to change it. And, you can’t do anything about it or guard against it, so don’t even try. Life will be what it is, and that includes relationships.

    As I have said for years… “You never really know who your sleeping with” And it applies even if it has been thirty plus years.

  3. Rock36 says:

    I suppose my “red pill” moment was nearly 10 years ago in St. Louis. My buddy flew out a relatively attractive teacher from Olympia, WA for a weekend of NSA fun, and I had the pleasure of being the third wheel at dinner that night. Anyway, during the course of the dinner, she related a story about some poor sap back in Olympia that would utterly fawn over her, frequently take her to dinner, and outwardly pursued a romantic relationship with her. She truly seemed to delight in stringing this guy along with no intention of fulfilling his desires for more. I’d almost say she was bragging if I didn’t also sense she felt at least a small measure of pity towards the guy. Meanwhile she flew two thirds of the way across the country to sexually frolic with my buddy in St. Louis for the weekend.

    Anyway, at first I personally wanted to use her example as an indictment against all modern women, but after some reflection I realized she was simply a shitty person.

    Thankfully, I’ve never had to resort to PUA tactics, and I haven’t been relegated to becoming an INCEL as a consequence. Although I am confident, which is really the only thing the PUA community truly gets right in my view. The disconnect I see is one in which being a jerk implies confidence (which it can and does), but having confidence does not necessarily imply being a jerk. There is a classic confidence based on establishing and maintaining personal boundaries, old-fashioned backbone, healthy ambition, and general self-esteem that will remain classically attractive.

    Then again my perceptions may be skewed, because the majority of my relationships have been with foreign women over the last eight years. So I may be missing a broader trend in American dating culture.

  4. arbuckle says:

    Well, the real world of women is not only fashion models and those used to living in $750K homes.

    You have foreign women, women with children, women that work at Burger King, women of different cultures/races, women that are religious, women that are older, women that are overweight, women with disabilities, etc. Pigeon-holing the lot as bombshell danger-seeking missiles isn’t really accurate and I don’t think the entire situation is as dire as you have painted.

    I have a hard time feeling too bad for most of the INCEL guys. They might be smart, but they are also lazy. Your one line in this post summed it up perfectly: the lonely guy is sitting at the bar staring at his glass feeling sorry for himself while the lame faux-hawk guy is actually moving around and talking to people. What does he expect to happen in this scenario?

    These INCEL men have probably never been turned down by a woman their entire lives, but a combination of approach anxiety, fear of rejection, and crazy expectations all add up to a solitary existence.

  5. jz78817 says:

    guess you could call me an “INCEL.” though that’s probably most likely due to my complete lack of social skills and anxiety issues. I feel most comfortable when I’m by myself.

  6. CGHill says:

    About a year ago, I actually turned out a piece on this Incel business, with the unfortunate title Lackanooky Valley.

    • Jack says:

      I’ve actually read that piece. I chortled the whole time because of the “M3″ logo in the header.

      “Kid,” I said to myself, “the best way to not get laid is to form a spiritual relationship with your BMW M3.”

  7. disinterested-observer says:

    I have never heard the term “incel” but if you are “involuntarily celibate” then you are punk and the only one you have to blame is looking at you in the mirror.

    Whatever his other failings may be, the author of this site plays guitars and races cars. I can’t do either of those things but I can do some other stuff that enriches the lives of the people around me. Maybe the reason you are “incel” is because you are a worthless piece of shit that no self-respecting man or woman would have anything to do with.

    • Jack says:

      Harsh, bro! :)

      I’d say that most incels are pretty decent people, just unsocialized, or shy, or sometimes just plain unattractive. It can be as simple as being shorter than the other kids in school, or having to eat the free lunch in front of your classmates. It can also be about being a piece of shit, to be sure.

      • Kevin Jaeger says:

        Definitely harsh, but sometimes the truth hurts.

        Of course there’s another class of incel - those who were successful enough when they were single, but then get cut off in marriage after the kids are born.

        I pity the poor incel committed to staying with his family and stubbornly trying to revive his frigid wife’s interest year after year.

    • jz78817 says:

      gee, thanks :(

  8. Patrick-Bateman! says:

    Jack, your writing has elevated you to the level of Russell Bulgin, and L. J. K. Setright in my world. It is rare that a motoring orientated writer can generate such thought provoking subject matter.

    Thank God you are alive ! (Hmmm does that sound like something an “incel” would say ?)

    • Jack says:

      I think the stereotypical incel would say, instead, “Thank the God who doesn’t exist that these Pokemon packs remain sealed.” :)

  9. A disproportionate number of incels are extremely intelligent, because a majority of women tend to be suspicious of intelligence in men and associate it with creepiness/nerdiness/unfuckability.

    The good Lord gives and the good Lord takes away.

    • CGHill says:

      Yea, verily. I’ve spent much of the last half-century trying to demonstrate that I’m not so damn smart after all. (Evidently I’m not smart enough to make that work.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>